{"id":1588,"date":"2024-10-28T17:50:55","date_gmt":"2024-10-28T17:50:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/dmediagh.com\/?p=1588"},"modified":"2024-10-28T17:50:57","modified_gmt":"2024-10-28T17:50:57","slug":"bagbin-rejects-supreme-court-writ-on-vacant-seats-ruling-returns-documents","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/dmediagh.com\/index.php\/2024\/10\/28\/bagbin-rejects-supreme-court-writ-on-vacant-seats-ruling-returns-documents\/","title":{"rendered":"Bagbin rejects Supreme Court writ on vacant seats ruling, returns documents"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

The Speaker of Parliament, Alban Bagbin has directed the return of a set of court documents served by bailiffs on the Parliamentary Service, citing constitutional immunity under Article 117 of the 1992 Constitution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This move, communicated through an official letter from the Office of the Speaker, highlights Parliament’s stance on judicial procedures involving Members of Parliament (MPs).<\/p>\n\n\n\n

In a letter addressed to the Supreme Court, the Speaker\u2019s office noted, “The attached processes which were left at the Legal Services Office of the Parliamentary Service by three bailiffs of the Court on Wednesday, 16th October 2024, are hereby returned.”<\/p>\n\n\n

\n
\"\"<\/figure>\n<\/div>\n\n\n

The statement signed by the Deputy Clerk of Parliament, Ebenezer Djietror, the Speaker\u2019s office stated that this service attempt was contrary to established constitutional provisions and a recent directive from the Judicial Secretary.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

According to the letter, Speaker Bagbin referenced a circular issued by Justice Cyra Pamela C.A. Korangteng, the Judicial Secretary, on July 12, 2024, with the title “Enforcement of articles 117 and 118 of the Constitution – Immunity from Service of Process and Arrest.”<\/p>\n\n\n\n

“The Rt. Hon. Speaker has directed the return of the attached processes for your necessary action,” the letter concluded, suggesting that the Judiciary take note of the constitutional restrictions regarding the service of court documents to Members of Parliament.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Background<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n

On October 18, the Supreme Court issued a stay of execution on Speaker Alban Bagbin’s ruling, which declared four parliamentary seats vacant.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Parliament was, in essence, instructed to recognise and allow the four MPs to fully represent their constituencies and carry out their official duties.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

This directive will remain in effect, not for the 10 days initially requested by the applicants, but until the Supreme Court delivers its final ruling on the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The application to stay the Speaker’s decision was filed by NPP MPs who sought the Court’s intervention to halt the enforcement of the ruling that would have affected three of their colleagues and one from the NDC.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

The application was filed ex parte, meaning that neither Speaker Bagbin nor Parliament was joined to the case.<\/p>\n\n\n\n